Tech

NY State Sen. Carl Kruger proposes ban on handheld devices

Tech News


By Steve Ragan Feb 8, 2007, 17:14 GMT

View blog reactions

If you liked this story please support M&C and Buzz the site on Yahoo.


Latest Headlines in Tech

Talkback

Add your comment (no registration required)

page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 

joeypFeb 8th, 2007 - 17:56:41

Anyone ever heard of natural selection? If they are getting themselves killed it's good for the gene pool.

Report this comment

AaronFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:02:22

I cannot believe the words 'crisis' arose in this article. I have an mp3 player and a cell phone here in vegas and I can still be aware of my surroundings when i walk or take the bus anywhere, these people are to easily distracted. Now, the use of a cell phone in a car i can understand, but what about GPS navigators and blue tooth headsets? Technology is advancing to quickly and soon supposed bans like this won't be necessary

Report this comment

MeFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:03:02

It is rather obvious that Mr. Kruger has Ipod Envy. He probably doesn't even know how to use it or any of the other 'new-age' technologies such as a Wal-Man.

This is the same idiotic reasoning that would be used to ban jewelry in public. Someone might be blinded by a flash coming of those sparkly ear rings and make you step into the street to avoid the glare and Gasp!!! get hit by a car.

If someone is so absorbed in his or her 'sound producing device' that he loses all senses, maybe we should clasify this as a controlled substance and charge people for DU-I(pod)'s.

Report this comment

Luke ArcherFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:05:13

My stomach is churning as I read this article. It is an invasion of personal rights and a typical example of government overstepping their bounds. What's next- a ban on hats that may block someone's view or perhaps a ban on sunglasses? Why not just ban walking on street altogether? Does anyone actually feel this is a product use of our tax dollars? I think I am going to go throw-up.

Report this comment

Lola WilliamsFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:05:55

Why not get rid of guns first!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Report this comment

DSFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:12:21

One thing to think about...
With this law in place, the next time someone gets squashed because they were walking in traffic, the city will probably be able to go after the pedestrian for money(more than $100) in court because they were breaking the law.

Report this comment

SteppieFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:13:12

In the name of his Majesty - Safety!

This is kinda similar to 'alcohol related vehicular accidents', which according to such statements amount to 50% of all fatalities. The conclusion is that drinking and driving do not mix well.

Gee, if people stopped driving all 100% of vehicular accidednts would be eliminated.

Why is that Kruger considers hend helds for deaths of those people, when it is the vehicles that killed them, or those driving them? Therefore, driving is what it should be banned - in the name of Safety!

Report this comment

Jim AdamsFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:17:26

New York State is the highest taxed state in the country. There are no jobs in upstate New York and our residets can not leave fast enough. This Senator like all our Representatives in Albany do not have an answer for our Real problems, but isnt it funny that they come up with idiotic laws like this. They like to let us poor serfs know they care about our well being.
As our New Govenor stated upstate NY is like Appalachia.

Report this comment

bobFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:18:11

this is probobly one of the more stupid things i had heard...i will have to agree with the natral selection idea, if they are stupid enough to cross a bust street and not look around first, i dont want them breeding.

Report this comment

joyceFeb 8th, 2007 - 18:21:52

Are we allowed to talk to a friend that is walking with us? Then why shouldn't we talk on the phone? A live friend can be a whole lot more distracting than an iPod or cell.

We could require a common sense competancy test before allowing people to leave their homes without supervision. Oh, wait, that would mean most of our politicians couldn't go to work.

Report this comment

page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12 

Add your comment (no registration required)

Latest from M&C Blogs

Biden: good choice or admission of Obama's weakness? - Global Eye on August 25, 2008 6:45 AM | | Comments (8) | TrackBacks (0)
Are political campaigns wasting their money on undecided voters? - Global Eye on August 22, 2008 7:49 AM | | Comments (9) | TrackBacks (0)
Musharraf exits the Pakistani stage as storm clouds gather - Global Eye on August 20, 2008 7:40 AM | | Comments (11) | TrackBacks (0)
Upside-down House - The World in Pictures on August 4, 2008 11:33 AM | | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)
Church of our Lady in Dresden, Germany - The World in Pictures on August 4, 2008 11:17 AM | | Comments (6) | TrackBacks (0)
Giant Orange - The World in Pictures on July 15, 2008 5:16 PM | | Comments (8) | TrackBacks (0)

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising