NY State Sen. Carl Kruger proposes ban on handheld devices
Tech News
By Steve Ragan Feb 8, 2007, 17:14 GMT
If you liked this story please support M&C and Buzz the site on Yahoo.
Latest Headlines in Tech
- 1. Memory matters
- 2. Check specifications of MP3 players before buying
- 3. Digital audio books bring reading back to the masses
- 4. In photos: 'Alison Carroll and Prep at Leipzig Games Convention'
- 5. Wireless security at home
Talkback
Add your comment (no registration required)
page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
I cannot believe the words 'crisis' arose in this article. I have an mp3 player and a cell phone here in vegas and I can still be aware of my surroundings when i walk or take the bus anywhere, these people are to easily distracted. Now, the use of a cell phone in a car i can understand, but what about GPS navigators and blue tooth headsets? Technology is advancing to quickly and soon supposed bans like this won't be necessary
It is rather obvious that Mr. Kruger has Ipod Envy. He probably doesn't even know how to use it or any of the other 'new-age' technologies such as a Wal-Man.
This is the same idiotic reasoning that would be used to ban jewelry in public. Someone might be blinded by a flash coming of those sparkly ear rings and make you step into the street to avoid the glare and Gasp!!! get hit by a car.
If someone is so absorbed in his or her 'sound producing device' that he loses all senses, maybe we should clasify this as a controlled substance and charge people for DU-I(pod)'s.
My stomach is churning as I read this article. It is an invasion of personal rights and a typical example of government overstepping their bounds. What's next- a ban on hats that may block someone's view or perhaps a ban on sunglasses? Why not just ban walking on street altogether? Does anyone actually feel this is a product use of our tax dollars? I think I am going to go throw-up.
Why not get rid of guns first!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
One thing to think about...
With this law in place, the next time someone gets squashed because they were walking in traffic, the city will probably be able to go after the pedestrian for money(more than $100) in court because they were breaking the law.
In the name of his Majesty - Safety!
This is kinda similar to 'alcohol related vehicular accidents', which according to such statements amount to 50% of all fatalities. The conclusion is that drinking and driving do not mix well.
Gee, if people stopped driving all 100% of vehicular accidednts would be eliminated.
Why is that Kruger considers hend helds for deaths of those people, when it is the vehicles that killed them, or those driving them? Therefore, driving is what it should be banned - in the name of Safety!
New York State is the highest taxed state in the country. There are no jobs in upstate New York and our residets can not leave fast enough. This Senator like all our Representatives in Albany do not have an answer for our Real problems, but isnt it funny that they come up with idiotic laws like this. They like to let us poor serfs know they care about our well being.
As our New Govenor stated upstate NY is like Appalachia.
this is probobly one of the more stupid things i had heard...i will have to agree with the natral selection idea, if they are stupid enough to cross a bust street and not look around first, i dont want them breeding.
Are we allowed to talk to a friend that is walking with us? Then why shouldn't we talk on the phone? A live friend can be a whole lot more distracting than an iPod or cell.
We could require a common sense competancy test before allowing people to leave their homes without supervision. Oh, wait, that would mean most of our politicians couldn't go to work.
Latest from M&C Blogs
joeypFeb 8th, 2007 - 17:56:41
Anyone ever heard of natural selection? If they are getting themselves killed it's good for the gene pool.
Report this comment